Sources: Dictionary of Atheism, Skepticism, and Humanism
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Secular humanism and atheism beyond progressive secularism
"Freethinkers," including both atheists and secular humanists, have always been a minority in American society--and not a very popular one. There are still laws in several states preventing non-theists from holding office. Just as evangelical Protestants up until one hundred years ago held a largely optimistic view of the future and the end times (known as postmillennialism), secular humanists ...
متن کاملDynamic Dictionary = Cooperative Information Sources
In this article a multi-source system is presented as a case-study in order to show how agents can be used to build a dynamic dictionary. In this context a dictionary has a much wider sense than usual: anything that can give information about a term (whatever term may be) is a dictionary. The dictionary is composed by several information sources with different domains (knowledge area and cardin...
متن کاملThe New Atheism
In what may be his best book to date, Victor Stenger (Professor Emeritus of Physics) provides a much needed summary, elaboration, and defense of the main theses of the so-called “New Atheists” (NAs), known for their widely-publicized, unrelenting, and passionate critiques of theism and religion in general. Among these NAs, Stenger includes authors of recent bestsellers in the United States: Sam...
متن کاملThe Presumption Of Atheism
We have already stated summarily what the punishment should be for temple-robbing, whether by open force or secretly. But the punishments for the various sorts of insolence in speech or action with regard to the gods, which a man can show in word or deed, have to be proclaimed after we have provided an exordium. Let this be it: "No one believing, as the laws prescribe, in the existence of the g...
متن کاملA new philosophy of man and humanism
The theoretical basis for the new philosophy was laid by the American philosopher James Joseph Dagenais (1923-1981), who came to the conclusion that philosophical anthropology is not a science, but a domain unto itself, and that a philosophy of man can only come about as a joint undertaking of all sciences, in which the object of study must be man himself. The final explanation of man lies outs...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Reference & User Services Quarterly
سال: 2007
ISSN: 1094-9054
DOI: 10.5860/rusq.46n3.92.2